Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois Faces Potential Gender Affirming Care Class Action

A transgender teenager’s gender-affirming care is at the heart of a potential class action lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois. According to the lawsuit, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois refused to cover the gender-affirming care as part of an employer plan, which is a violation of the anti-discrimination provision in the Affordable Care Act.

Plaintiffs allege they are covered by an employer plan through Catholic Health Initiatives that is administered by Blue Cross. Blue Cross refused coverage citing a blanket exclusion for services related to gender transition. The lawsuit states that religious employers can assert an exemption from the Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act but that Blue Cross is not a religious organization, and the plan is self-funded, so the exemption is not applicable.   

The plaintiffs are looking to represent a class of other self-funded plans administered by Blue Cross with similar exclusions for the particular gender-affirming care.

The case is Pritchard v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, U.S. District Court for the District of Washington, No. 3:20-cv-06145.


This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

Sign up to receive Class Actions Blog posts in your inbox!

Steve Larson
An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve's clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.

Share: 

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.