Division I Athletes Fight for Class Certification Against NCAA

In the antitrust class action House v. NCAA, former and current Division I athletes seek compensation for not being given the right to use their NIL (name, image, and likeness) for commercial purposes. The potential $1.4 billion lawsuit alleges the NCAA deprived them of media rights and sponsorships, and the NCAA’s subsequent use of the athlete’s NIL’s, has awarded the NCAA and its membership billions of dollars.

The defendants allege in a 50- page opposition to the class certification motion that there are differences in NIL value and so class members claims are not proper for a class action. They state that some athletes have accumulated millions of dollars of economic value tied to their NIL, where others yield a negligible value. These differences can be tied to certain sports being broadcast to a larger audience or having more media coverage.

If class certification is granted, class members may consist of competing Division I athletes from June 15, 2020, to January 27, 2025. Additional Division I athletes who from 2016 in football, men’s and women’s basketball and additional sports may also be eligible.

This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

Sign up to receive Class Actions Blog posts in your inbox!

Steve Larson

An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, environmental clean-up litigation, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve’s clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.


Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.