John Hancock Settles Insurance Class Action for $91 Million

John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) has entered into a preliminary settlement with certain owners of its universal and variable universal life insurance policies who have policies that contain a contractual promise that “Applied Monthly Rates will be based on [John Hancock’s] expectations of future mortality experience”—and nothing else. The settlement, which awards the policyholders $91.25 million in cash relief, resolves a putative class action lawsuit filed in the Southern District of New York in December 2015.

The Plaintiff, who had a Universal Life Estate Protection policy with John Hancock, contended in the suit that (1) John Hancock should have lowered its cost of insurance (COI) rates to account for improved mortality, (2) John Hancock incorporated improper non-mortality factors into its COI rates, and (3) that John Hancock charged certain improper Age 100 Rider charges. As a result of John Hancock’s actions, Plaintiff asserted that policyholders were forced to pay unlawful and excessive charges and premiums.

The settlement fund will be directly distributed to class members without the need for members to submit claim forms. Additionally, $1 million has been set aside for notice and administration costs.

The case is 37 Besen Parkway LLC v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co., Case No.: 1:15-cv-09924, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

Sign up to receive Class Actions Blog posts in your inbox!

Steve Larson

An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, environmental clean-up litigation, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve’s clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.


Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.