Ski Giants Face Antitrust Lawsuit Over Epic and Ikon Pass Pricing

A new federal antitrust lawsuit is taking aim at two of the ski industry’s biggest names, Vail Resorts, Inc. and Alterra Mountain Company. Filed on March 23rd, 2026, in the U.S. District Court of the District of Colorado by DiCello Levitt, Berger Montague PC, and Salahi PC, the case claims the companies use pricing tactics tied to their Epic Pass and Ikon Pass to limit competition and push skiers into buying season passes.

The lawsuit argues that single-day lift tickets are priced so high that customers feel they have no real choice but to purchase a pass despite claims that both options are overpriced. Plaintiffs also say this system has led to overcrowded slopes, long lift lines, and skiers feeling “locked in” for the season. Attorney Greg Asciolla described these issues as the result of “exclusionary conduct,” not normal market forces.

Vail Resorts pushed back, noting it launched the Epic Pass in 2008 with a 60% price drop and cut prices another 20% in 2021, arguing it still offers strong value. The lawsuit is seeking damages for customers and aims to bring more competition back to the ski resort market.


This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

Sign up to receive Class Actions Blog posts in your inbox!

Steve Larson

An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, environmental clean-up litigation, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve’s clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.

Share: 

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.