Current and former employees for the call center of Harry & David in Medford, Oregon filed a potential class action lawsuit in March 2018 which was conditionally certified under the FLSA in January 2019. The case seeks to recover unpaid regular and overtime wages alleged owed pursuant to the FLSA and Oregon wage statutes. The court recently granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification.

The lawsuit alleges that Harry & David did not pay its Medford call center employees for all time worked on site, they did not provide 30-minute meal breaks, and required employees to perform duties both before and after shifts which were not properly compensated. The class is defined as all current and former hourly-paid call center agents at the Harry & David Medford, Oregon call center who at any time since March 8, 2012 worked in call-handling positions.

The case is Jennifer Harrison v. Harry & David Operations, Inc., et al., in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Medford Division, Case No. 1:18-cv-00410-CL. Steve Larson with the law firm of Stoll Berne is one of the attorneys representing the class members in this action.

This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

Sign up to receive Class Actions Blog posts in your inbox!

Fotolia FootballThe Cincinnati Bengals organization was sued  in a putative class action in Ohio federal court alleging it denies its cheerleaders minimum wage, less than a month after current and former members of the Oakland Raiders  cheer squad filed suit over similar allegations.

Continue reading “Cincinnati Bengals sued by cheerleaders for minimum wage violation”

Law and justice concept, gavelQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP has lost its attempt to appeal a New York federal judge’s refusal to dismiss a putative class action over the law firm’s alleged failure to pay overtime to temporary attorneys.

Continue reading “Quinn Emmanuel loses bid to appeal wage and hour class action brought by temporary attorneys”