In Robins v. Spokeo, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that plaintiffs seeking to sue in federal court must have a concrete, actual injury; a mere statutory violation is not enough.
Continue reading “Ninth Circuit confirms concrete injury alleged in Spokeo case”
The Ninth Circuit found that the Plaintiff that filed a complaint against Spokeo alleging that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by reporting inaccurate information about him had alleged a sufficiently concrete injury to meet the Article III standing requirement established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the same case earlier this year.
Continue reading “Ninth Circuit says Plaintiff in Spokeo case alleged concrete injury”
On May 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme remanded back to the Ninth Circuit for further analysis the Robins v. Spokeo case.
Continue reading “Supreme court takes middle road in Spokeo case”
