Anheuser-Busch drivers allege overtime violations

ABAnheuser-Busch InBev has been hit with a $5 million lawsuit by a pair of its employees who say the beer-brewing giant failed to pay its truck drivers for overtime hours and did not allow them to take meal and rest breaks.

The lawsuit, filed by drivers Charles Hill and Joe Correa in federal court in California, is a putative class action filed on behalf of other AB InBev drivers. The plaintiffs say they are still determining the potential size of the class, but it could reach 400 members based on the number of California drivers the company either currently employs or employed within the past four years.

Hill and Correa allege they have “worked numerous weeks in excess of 40 hours” during their time with AB InBev and that the company has not paid them the minimum overtime rate of 1.5 times their regular pay for the extra hours they worked.  Hill and Correa also allege AB InBev did not allow them to take paid meal and rest breaks, despite the company having a written policy to allow such breaks.

The drivers say they are normally paid a flat daily rate, plus an additional 10 cents per case of alcoholic beverages that they deliver to retailers throughout California. The lawsuit argues that the company “used the piece-rate payment structure specifically to eliminate any payments due for rest breaks.” In other words, they say drivers end up being discouraged from taking breaks because they are paid the same amount, based on the number of cases delivered, whether they take a break or not.

Steve Larson
An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve's clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.