Wal-Mart decision may affect Costco class action

Costco Wholesale Corp. may be able to block women accusing it of gender bias from suing as a group because of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in a discrimination suit against Wal-Mart Stores Inc.  The women sued Costco in 2004, accusing the largest U.S. warehouse-club chain of limiting promotions of female employees to assistant general manager and general manager by failing to post such job openings.  They won the right to sue as a group in a class action in 2007.  Costco’s appeal of that order was put on hold while the Supreme Court considered Dukes v. Wal-Mart.

The lawsuit against Costco features the same lawyers using similar theories, and some of the same experts.  Brad Seligman, a lead attorney for plaintiffs in both suits says that the Costco case is a much narrower case, covering just two types of managers who were affected by decisions made above the store level.  However, the Costco judge’s decision to certify an injunctive class under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 23(b)(2) is similar to the initial decisions allowing the Wal-Mart class.  The Supreme Court in Dukes rejected that approach 9-0.

The case is Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.  (COST), 04-03341, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

Steve Larson
An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve's clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on google
Share on linkedin

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.