Samsung and Toshiba Settle Optical Disc Drive Price Fixing Claims for $25 Million

Samsung and Toshiba agreed to pay $25 million to resolve a class action alleging that they participated in an industry-wide conspiracy to fix optical disk drive prices. The plaintiffs settling the case were indirect purchasers of the drives; ie. consumers. If approved, the proposed deal would bring the total amount of consumer settlements in the case to $205 million.

Samsung and Toshiba were among the defendants named in the litigation over the price of optical disk drives, a key component for reading and writing data on CDs, DVDs and Blu-ray discs that are found in computers, video game consoles and other devices. The litigation, which centered on an alleged industry-wide price-fixing conspiracy, was consolidated in 2010 and included claims brought by indirect purchasers, direct purchasers, retailers and states.

In December, the federal district court granted Samsung, Toshiba and Philips Corp. summary judgment in the MDL, finding the consumers didn’t prove the alleged conspiracy had pass-through effects causing injury or damages. But the consumers appealed that ruling to the Ninth Circuit.

The MDL is In re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation, case number 3:10-md-02143, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Northern California.

This blog is intended to provide information to the general public and to practitioners about developments that may impact Oregon class actions.

Sign up to receive Class Actions Blog posts in your inbox!

Steve Larson
An experienced trial lawyer who handles both hourly and contingent fee cases, Steve has expertise in class actions, antitrust litigation, securities litigation, corporate disputes, intellectual property disputes, unfair competition claims, and disputes involving family wealth. Steve regularly represents individuals and businesses in federal and state court and has obtained class-wide recovery in multiple class actions. A veteran practitioner, Steve's clients value his creative approach to resolving complex litigation matters.


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Legal Disclaimer

The information contained in this blog does not constitute legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. We make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to this blog.